Would Bradford artist David Hockney agree it’s grim up north?
They say it’s grim up north.
And according to a quality of life study they are right – apparently people in southern England enjoy a higher quality of life than those in northern regions of the UK.
Banking group Halifax said 28 out of the top 30 local authorities that offer the best quality of life are in southern England, with Rutland and Blaby in Leicester the only places outside of the south to make it on to the list.
Places in the South East accounted for 19 of the top 30 local authorities for quality of life, while there were six in the East of England, two in London and one in the South West.
The highest ranked region in the North East was Castle Morpeth, in Northumberland, which ranked 43rd overall, while Hambleton, in 85th place, was the highest ranked local authority in Yorkshire.
Elmbridge in Surrey topped Halifax’s quality of life survey – which scored local authorities in Great Britain according to a range of factors, such as employment, earnings, home-ownership, the environment, education and health – for the second year running.
The bank said 95% of people in Elmbridge were in good health, people in the area had a high average life expectancy of 81.1 years, higher-than-average weekly earnings of £1,064, while 76% owned their own home.
The area also had above average employment rates, while children got above average GCSE results, and it typically enjoyed a good climate with 32.7 hours of sunshine a week and less than average rainfall.
East Hertfordshire was identified as offering the second highest quality of life, followed by Surrey Heath, Uttlesford in Essex, and Sevenoaks.
No local authorities in Scotland made it into the top 100, with Aberdeenshire the highest ranked area at 153rd.
Wales fared even worse, with the Vale of Glamorgan offering the best quality of life in the region, but coming only 194th overall.
Recent Comments